Dr. Kizza Besigye appeared in Court Over 2022 Protest Charges.

Dr. Kizza Besigye, a veteran opposition leader in Uganda, appeared before the Buganda Road Chief Magistrates Court on charges related to inciting violence during protests in 2022 against the high cost of food prices.

Kizza Besigye in Court Over 2022 Protest Charges.

These charges stem from actions taken when Besigye, alongside opposition activist Samuel Lubega Mukaaku, organized demonstrations in Kampala concerning the escalating prices of commodities. The protests in question occurred in June 2022, leading to accusations of causing disruption in downtown Kampala.

The court proceedings have been marked by delays and legal challenges. Recently, on January 9, 2025, the court could not proceed as Besigye was not produced, being on remand in Luzira on separate charges by the General Court Martial. This has led to debates between the prosecution and defense about responsibility for his absence. Magistrate Nankya Jatiko has given one final adjournment for the prosecution to summon witnesses, with a warning that the case might be closed if they fail to do so.

Besigye's legal team, led by Erias Lukwago, has challenged various aspects of the evidence, including the testimony of Scene of Crime Officers, arguing that some evidence was not disclosed earlier. There's also contention over the use of a military court for Besigye's trial on other charges, which he objects to, advocating for a civilian court hearing.

The backdrop to these legal battles includes Besigye's history of political activism against the government, often highlighting economic hardships and criticizing government policy. His case has attracted significant public and political attention, reflecting ongoing tensions between opposition figures and the Ugandan government.

Recent posts on X have echoed the courtroom developments, highlighting the ongoing legal tussles and the political implications of Besigye's court appearances, though these should be treated with caution as they reflect sentiment rather than conclusive factual evidence.